On 6 March 2018 at 06:17, Philip Balister <phi...@balister.org> wrote:
> On 03/05/2018 03:08 PM, Anton Gerasimov wrote:
>>> Including this in meta-xilinx-bsp would be fine since it is a
>>> generally available board and low cost as well.
>>> However I am not sure it would be worth including if it relies on
>>> adding support with patches. It would be best if those parts were
>>> upstreamed to U-Boot/Linux first then adding the patches as backports
>>> if required.
>> Yes, sure, that totally makes sense. I've submitted the patch to
>> g...@xilinx.com and will keep you updated on the progress.
> Shouldn't they go to the upstream projects, not the local Xilinx repo?

Ideally yes mainline Linux and U-Boot are where the patches should be
submitted. Sorry if that was not clear in my previous comments.

It is very likely that the Xilinx people on the g...@xilinx.com list
will direct you to submit it to mainline.

meta-xilinx mailing list

Reply via email to