Eric Wong writes: > It can set/unset volatile metadata for any number of messages. > > "Volatile metadata" being "labels" (aka "mailboxes" in > JMAP-speak) and "keywords" (seen|flagged|answered|...), > (aka "flags" in IMAP/Maildir-speak). > > "lei mark +kw:seen" # makes sense
> "lei mark +L:some-folder-name" # might sound odd... > > > AFAIK, notmuch uses "notmuch tag" which combines both labels > and keywords into one thing: "tags". But I'm also not a > notmuch user... (I am, though I still might be wrong.) Notmuch allows arbitrary tags to be associated with message IDs. It has some automatic tags like "attachment", "encrypted", and "signed" that it adds when indexing. By default, it also syncs some maildir flags to its tags (e.g., "F -> flagged", "R -> replied", "No S -> unread"). As far as I understand, tags are never connected up to the maildir folder/location, though Notmuch does support a separate "folder:..." search term. So, I guess in JMAP terms, Notmuch tags would be "mailboxes" (a subset of which are synced with maildir flags). > Would "lei tag" be better? Neither one really jumps out to me as better. "mark" sounds fine to me, and I don't find "tag" any more or less odd for the +L case above. > Anything else? Nothing comes to mind.
