Yaseen Mowzer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On my monitor #333 on #fff is a little bit hard to read. I think normal
> text should just be #000.
I wasn't completely sure about it, myself; but I can't stand
light backgrounds in general floaters in my eyes are getting
worse (AFAIK there's no treatment, either).
> The head style uses the contrast between #333 and #000 for emphasis. To
> preserve the emphasis `font-weight: bold` was added to the head style.
> ---
>
> I changed my mind about the head style. I think we should make it bold
> instead of loosing the emphasis. This is more consitent with what git
> diff does.
OK, more inline...
> diff --git a/contrib/css/216light.css b/contrib/css/216light.css
> index c66cfdfe..c68ca9ce 100644
> --- a/contrib/css/216light.css
> +++ b/contrib/css/216light.css
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
> * Suitable for print, and blinding people with brightness.
> * Haphazardly thrown together because bright colors hurt my eyes
> */
> -* { background:#fff; color:#333 }
> +* { background:#fff; color:#000 }
I find #000 on #fff too intense for large swaths of text.
Would #030 or #003 (dark green/blue) work for you?
> /*
> * Underlined links add visual noise which make them hard-to-read.
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ a:visited { color:#808 }
> */
> *.add { color:#060 }
> *.del {color:#900 }
> -*.head { color:#000 }
> +*.head { color:#000; font-weight:bold }
I've been avoiding bold for stuff that might be important
because some fonts or low-res displays make bold hard-to-read.
Maybe something subtle like #300 work? Or keep it #000
if foreground becomes #030 or #003.
(I think .head is the least important element to highlight by
a long shot).
> *.hunk { color:#960 }
>
> /*
--
unsubscribe: one-click, see List-Unsubscribe header
archive: https://public-inbox.org/meta/
