It's possible in theory that Perl could be smarter and free
memory a tad sooner this way. Regardless, fewer lines of code
is easier-to-navigate/read and can save optree size and reduce
parsing times.
---
lib/PublicInbox/ContentHash.pm | 6 ++----
lib/PublicInbox/MID.pm | 6 ++----
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/PublicInbox/ContentHash.pm b/lib/PublicInbox/ContentHash.pm
index d3ff146a..a4f6196f 100644
--- a/lib/PublicInbox/ContentHash.pm
+++ b/lib/PublicInbox/ContentHash.pm
@@ -76,8 +76,7 @@ sub content_digest ($;$) {
last;
}
foreach my $h (qw(Subject Date)) {
- my @v = $eml->header($h);
- foreach my $v (@v) {
+ for my $v ($eml->header($h)) {
utf8::encode($v);
$dig->add("$h\0$v\0");
}
@@ -86,8 +85,7 @@ sub content_digest ($;$) {
# not in the original message. For the purposes of deduplication,
# do not take it into account:
foreach my $h (qw(To Cc)) {
- my @v = $eml->header($h);
- digest_addr($dig, $h, $_) foreach @v;
+ digest_addr($dig, $h, $_) for ($eml->header($h));
}
msg_iter($eml, \&content_dig_i, $dig);
$dig;
diff --git a/lib/PublicInbox/MID.pm b/lib/PublicInbox/MID.pm
index 4819cc25..b1ae9939 100644
--- a/lib/PublicInbox/MID.pm
+++ b/lib/PublicInbox/MID.pm
@@ -92,8 +92,7 @@ sub references ($) {
my ($hdr) = @_;
my @mids;
foreach my $f (qw(References In-Reply-To)) {
- my @v = $hdr->header_raw($f);
- foreach my $v (@v) {
+ for my $v ($hdr->header_raw($f)) {
push(@mids, ($v =~ /$MID_EXTRACT/g));
}
}
@@ -104,8 +103,7 @@ sub references ($) {
my %addr = ( y => 1, n => 1 );
foreach my $f (qw(To From Cc)) {
- my @v = $hdr->header_raw($f);
- foreach my $v (@v) {
+ for my $v ($hdr->header_raw($f)) {
$addr{$_} = 1 for (PublicInbox::Address::emails($v));
}
}