Štěpán Němec <[email protected]> wrote:
> Documentation/RelNotes/v1.9.0.eml | 2 +-
> Documentation/RelNotes/v2.0.0.wip | 6 +++---
> Documentation/lei-config.pod | 8 ++++----
> Documentation/lei-daemon-kill.pod | 2 +-
> Documentation/lei-inspect.pod | 4 ++--
> Documentation/lei-lcat.pod | 2 +-
> Documentation/lei-ls-mail-source.pod | 2 +-
> Documentation/lei-ls-search.pod | 2 +-
> Documentation/lei-mail-sync-overview.pod | 2 +-
> Documentation/lei-q.pod | 4 ++--
> Documentation/lei-security.pod | 8 ++++----
> Documentation/lei-store-format.pod | 2 +-
> Documentation/lei-up.pod | 4 ++--
Thanks, changes to those files look fine (but I'm no English
expert, either). My brain does jumble words often :x
> diff --git a/TODO b/TODO
> index de628e2e310a..36a7f0cf441a 100644
> --- a/TODO
> +++ b/TODO
> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ all need to be considered for everything we introduce.)
> archive locations to avoid SPOF.
>
> * optional Cache::FastMmap support so production deployments won't
> - need Varnish (Varnish doesn't protect NNTP nor IMAP, either)
> + need Varnish (Varnish doesn't protect NNTP or IMAP, either)
I'm not sure about this change, I seem to remember `nor' being
more suited for negatives. Any citations or comments from
others reading this?
> * dogfood and take advantage of new kernel APIs (while maintaining
> portability to older Linux, free BSDs and maybe Hurd).
> diff --git a/install/README b/install/README
> index 981e014b9959..e1b5558e0b87 100644
> --- a/install/README
> +++ b/install/README
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ TL;DR: sudo ./install/deps.perl all
>
> Files in this directory are designed for:
>
> -* users using from git or tarballs (and not the OS package manager)
> +* users using git repo or tarballs (and not the OS package manager)
I wonder if:
* users using our code from git or tarballs (and not the OS package manager)
...is better. I always feel the need to clarify git the software
vs. our code repo vs. our mirror on public-inbox.org/git *shrug*
> --- a/lib/PublicInbox/XapHelperCxx.pm
> +++ b/lib/PublicInbox/XapHelperCxx.pm
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ sub xap_cfg (@) {
> seek($err, 0, SEEK_SET) or die "seek: $!";
> $err = do { local $/; <$err> };
> die <<EOM;
> -@$cmd failed: Xapian devlopment files missing? (\$?=$?)
> +@$cmd failed: Xapian development files missing? (\$?=$?)
Yup, I also just noticed that on a different branch I'm been working on.
