"Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 11:49:06AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 02:58:18PM +0000, Salil Mehta wrote:
> > > Hi Michael,
> > > I have noticed something very strange. Review links have been 
> > > disappearing from the
> > > Qemu-devel mailing list. For example, please jump to the thread overview 
> > > present at
> > > the last of this mailing thread of vCPU Hotplug.
> > > 
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/[email protected]/#r
> > > 
> > > Some of the reviews done by Igor have simply disappeared from it. 
> > > 
> > > This one:
> > > 2023-10-13 10:51 ` 
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/[email protected]/
> > >  Salil Mehta via
> > >      [not found]   ` 
> > > <https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/[email protected]/>
> > >  ---> Why is this?
> > > 
> > > And this one:
> > > 2023-10-13 10:51 ` [PATCH V6 3/9] hw/acpi: Add ACPI CPU hotplug init stub 
> > > Salil Mehta via
> > >      [not found]   ` 
> > > <[email protected]>---> why is this?
> > > 2023-11-06 14:40     ` Salil Mehta via
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Any reasons you can think of or any leads you can give about whom should
> > > I contact for these kind of issues. Who is the maintainer of qemu-devel
> > > list?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Best regards
> > > Salil.
> > > 
> > 
> > I see the message here:
> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-10/msg09526.html
> > 
> > so it only disappeared from lore.kernel.org
> > 
> > Not 100% sure who to ask about it - Cc kernel.org/public-inbox devs and 
> > Konstantin who might know.
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> 
> Also - it looks like I should have been CC'd on this but I did not get
> a copy either. So something strange about this mail then? But gnu.org
> archive was able to recover.
> 
> Cc also Igor who sent this message - Igor could you attach a copy
> of the original?
> 
> Thanks!

FWIW, GNU has the mboxo||mboxrd file here:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/mbox/qemu-devel/2023-10

Looking at the raw message of
<[email protected]>
didn't reveal any obvious problems (HTML, spammy terms)

So I'm not sure why it didn't get into lore...

Reply via email to