David Bovill wrote:
>
> >> I can think of 2 kind of solutions :
> >>
> >> 1) solution based on signature
> >> The programmer put his signature in his runtime and in his stacks. When
> >> opening a stack, the runtime checks if the stack has the right signature.
> >> The process could be a "compress+encrypt" function built in the engine and a
> >> "decompress+decrypt" function build in the runtime.
> >
> >1.1) Why not as an RSA public/private keys encryptation system, stored, as a
> >metatalk script, in an encrypted client-side home stack or its substitute,
> >suitable, without any changes, with the actual 2.3.1 issue of MC ?
> >
>
> Pierre, please pojnt the way!
>
> I'd like to know how to script, it. What maths is involved? Is there an RFC? What
>would be the security loopholes etc...
>
David,
Sorry, i'm, for yet, just a newbie in SSH, RSA, SSL, etc.. stuffs, as i just
started to work on this to manage secure connections on <http://cyb.cndp.fr> and
some extranet services.
Please wait a month and i will gladly send you off-list the tested solutions
results (as .mc scripts if helpfull).
Kind Regards, Pierre Sahores
WEB, DB, B2B & ASP design.
There are countries where people
have six fingers because they
don't know the metric system.
Sir Jean Yanne
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard%40lists.best.com/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, not this list.
