There is an some GNU Open source PGP compatible code released 6 months ago, maybe this would be an easier route to scripting it within MetaCard? >David Bovill wrote: >> >> >> I can think of 2 kind of solutions : >> >> >> >> 1) solution based on signature >> >> The programmer put his signature in his runtime and in his stacks. When >> >> opening a stack, the runtime checks if the stack has the right signature. >> >> The process could be a "compress+encrypt" function built in the engine and a >> >> "decompress+decrypt" function build in the runtime. >> > >> >1.1) Why not as an RSA public/private keys encryptation system, stored, as a >> >metatalk script, in an encrypted client-side home stack or its substitute, >> >suitable, without any changes, with the actual 2.3.1 issue of MC ? >> > >> >> Pierre, please pojnt the way! >> >> I'd like to know how to script, it. What maths is involved? Is there an RFC? What >would be the security loopholes etc... >> > >David, > >Sorry, i'm, for yet, just a newbie in SSH, RSA, SSL, etc.. stuffs, as i just >started to work on this to manage secure connections on <http://cyb.cndp.fr> and >some extranet services. >Please wait a month and i will gladly send you off-list the tested solutions >results (as .mc scripts if helpfull). > >Kind Regards, Pierre Sahores > >WEB, DB, B2B & ASP design. >There are countries where people >have six fingers because they >don't know the metric system. >Sir Jean Yanne > >Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard%40lists.best.com/ >Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard%40lists.best.com/ Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm Please send bug reports to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, not this list.
