On 10/11/00 3:54 pm, Dave Cragg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This takes around 2 milliseconds. Increasing tNumLines to 5000 gives
> a result of about 12 milliseconds, which, given the overhead for
> building the data list, is about what you'd expect.
>
> On the other hand, this may not be the reason for your problem. But I
> like showing off the numbers. They always impress the hell out me. :)
My other favourite is putting data at the end of a field. Each time you add
to the end of a field it gets a little slower. But if you construct all the
output in a variable and then put it into a field in one shot at the end,
the problem is eliminated.
Regards,
Kevin
Kevin Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.runrev.com/>
Runtime Revolution Limited (formerly Cross Worlds Computing).
Tel: +44 (0)131 672 2909. Fax: +44 (0)1639 830 707.
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, not this list.
