Sorry, but this does bring up a valid point for me
I don't actually know what the conditions are to change the version number.
If some intelectual genius (or old grey experienced and time tested MetaCard
user - Simon?) might explain this to me then it would be much appreciated.
Regards
Monte
----- Original Message -----
From: "Simon Lord" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2000 12:55 AM
Subject: Re: graphobject
> Whoa, slow down. In the 10 years I have been using MetaCard it has gone
> from version 1.0 to 2.3.2 unlike apps half that age that are already in
> their 6th revision.
>
> I fully expect to see MetaCard version 2.4 followed by 2.4.1 and so on
over
> the next 2 years.
>
> 3.0 indeed, kids today...
>
> --
>
> Cheers,
> Simon
>
> Graphic Development: http://www.amigo-3.com
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> "The great discoveries in science are not punctuated by 'Eureka! I've
found
> it!' but rather "Hmmm,that's funny...." Isaac Asimov
>
> > From: "Monte Goulding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 00:02:05 +1030
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: graphobject
> >
> > Also Scott now that 2.3.2 is finished would it be possible for for the
list
> > to be posted with probable advances to be included in 2.4 or 3.0
whatever it
> > will be called.
>
>
> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
> Please send bug reports to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, not this list.
>
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, not this list.
