LiangTyan Fui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This maybe off topic a little:
> Would it be better to start sharing of the libURL stack by default on 2.4?
> This should offer a more transparent upgrade from 2.3 since URL support
> available without the need to turn it on.
It does this automatically now, but only in the development
environment (the main front script handles each message, starts
using the stack, then passes the message). It's technically
possible to have the engine do this automatically, but I'm not
sure if this is a good idea or not. It would better preserve
backward compatibility (though you will still have to move the
library into your application with the Resource Mover), but
means hard-coding the library name into the engine, making it
impossible to ever rename it or for people to add their own
libraries to handle certain types of URLs differently from
others. Which is more important?
Regards,
Scott
> Regards,
> LiangTyan Fui
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, not this list.
