Richard MacLemale wrote: > > > Subject: metacard for CGI > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > I am putting together some documentation regarding the use of > > metatalk/rev for CGI scripts and I wanted to ask the list for some > > feedback: > > > > -how many of you are currently using metatalk/rev for CGI > > I am...
Thanks for the input. <snip> > The biggest disadvantage is that no one has ever heard of it, and so you > have to explain to people what it is and what it does. And that's not a > huge disadvantage when you are the network admin, but it's probably no fun > when you are at the mercy on an internet provider. I have an even better one; after having convinced people to go with Metacard for various reasons the next question that needs to be answered (and a good one too) is what happens if you, the Metacard programmer, get hit by a car tomorrow (knock on wood), is there a viable replacement in sight? > > And debugging is a pain in the butt. :) Yes, we should get at least a line/word number in an error message but since the number of Metacard/CGI users is 4 so far, I don't expect we can dare ask for features. > > :) > Richard MacLemale > Instructional Technology Specialist > James W. Mitchell High School > http://mitchellonline.pasco.k12.fl.us > > _______________________________________________ > metacard mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard -- ____________________ Regards, Andu Novac _______________________________________________ metacard mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
