Thanks for the response. But, actually, my question was whether MC
treats numerically-indexed arrays in the usual row-column sense that's
used for matrix math. As for the question of buying MC or Revolution,
there is nothing about Revolution (as appealing as the face lift is)
that can justify a switch from MC for me.
Greg
On Monday, March 18, 2002, at 12:04 PM, metacard-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: crob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Arrays and Matrix Algebra
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> original message:
>> Arrays and Matrix Algebra
>> Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 11:51:31 -0500
>> From: Gregory Lypny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "MetaCard List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> Just wanted to confirm the correct way to set up arrays to be able
>> to do matrix math. If I have an array named X, does MetaCard treat
>> x[3,4] as the fourth element in the third row of X and x[8,2] as the
>> second element in the eigth row?
>>
>
> yes: if you put something into X[n], you can retrieve X[n], if you
> put something into X[m,n], you can retrieve X[m,n], both with
> MetaCard 2.4.1 and with Revolution 1.1.
> The problem is: which to buy? (my subscription to MetaCard has
> expired :(( )
>
> greets
> crob
_______________________________________________
metacard mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
