I'm using the send in <time> command to handle timers on as many as 108 controls simultaneously but I've disabled this part of the code and still have the problem. I'm using repeat loops all over the place but shouldn't a repeat loop give up resources when its done rather than use increasingly more resources as it runs longer?
Rich Mooney Payne Sparkman Mfg. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. Landman Gay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 1:28 PM Subject: Re: Fw: application slowing down > On 8/20/02 12:19 PM, Rich Mooney wrote: > > I currently have > >>a job which requires that I poll the status of all my controls every 30 > >>seconds. I do this so I can catch any changes of state and a close > >>approximation of the time at which that change occurred. I also use this > >>function to catch any errors in operation. The problem is that the time > >>it takes to poll all the controls becomes increasingly longer the longer > >>I run the software. > > Are you using a repeat loop, or the "send in <time>" method to poll? A > repeat loop would tie up resources. > > > -- > Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED] > HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com > > _______________________________________________ > metacard mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard _______________________________________________ metacard mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
