Ray Horsley wrote: > Once again, I owe a great big thanks to those on the list who helped me with > this thing. As it turned out, the idle handler was the solution. However, > it seems to me I remember some discusion on the list a while back about > problems with idle handlers under certain circumstances. If anyone > remembers what those problems were or where I can look them up, please let > me know.
The problem with idle is that it runs about 60 times every second, whether it's needed or not. Chances are that most of the times idle is called it is not needed, consuming CPU cycles with no benefit. In your case, where you need an action to be performed once after the repeat loop, it seems a perfect fit for "send in XX millisecs". -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Media Corporation Developer of WebMerge 2.2: Publish any database on any site ___________________________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com Tel: 323-225-3717 AIM: FourthWorldInc _______________________________________________ metacard mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
