[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone give us a difference list?
a summary:
MetaCard Revolution
Engine same same
Both use the same engine; languages features, speed etc. identical for both
I am not sure this is quite correct. The core language is the same, of course, but Rev has a number of extensions to the language of MetaCard. Although they are outside the engine itself, they are defined as part of Rev's language as far as I know (probably not all MC commands are purely in engine itself either).
IDE fast but spartan; feature-rich; slower few command keys in some operations and fewer palettes requiring lots of means many trips to palette updates the menu bar
I tried Rev earlier on my G3 PowerBook, my main MC development tool. The IDE took so much screen estate, I could barely work and had to constantly shift windows/palettes around. I wonder whether this got any better in 2.x.
Docs bare bones; extensive; complete often presumes examples for nearly familiarity every token; requires with UNIX; more memory compact
System requirements: cpu/memory ?
support list activity: posts per day ?
direct support from company: email/phone/costs ?
Robert _______________________________________________ metacard mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
