> <Quote> Actually, I would not mind continuing such a > general list for metacard as we have now. The Rev list > has more noise and significantly more traffic. People > who would likely remain on the MC list will be the > hardcore MC users and thus likely interested in at > least theoretical participation in changes to GUI. A > separate list for GUI developers can be always spun > off if the situation warrants it.</quote>
I like it because it takes a step out of the process. ;) To some degree this has been happening naturally already: most of us on this list also subscribe to the larger Rev list, so if this list has a little more IDE-specific traffic and maybe a less language discussion than some would prefer, then there's already a great community for that. But moreover, I don't think there are likely to be very many IDE-specific posts, since it seems what most MC users want is to maintain iits simplicity. I guess all we need now is for someone from the mother ship to lay down some ground rules on the mechanics of this process. Dr. Raney, what's the word? -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Media Corporation Developer of WebMerge 2.2: Publish any database on any site ___________________________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com Tel: 323-225-3717 AIM: FourthWorldInc _______________________________________________ metacard mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
