Mark Talluto wrote: > On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 06:30 AM, Robert Brenstein wrote: > >> Since using 'do' one can relatively easily work around the 'set script >> to' restriction (performance issues aside), we can only expect further >> elimination of 'do' in standalones (do limit set to 0) in a near >> future. It would be a logical followup to fully close that loophole. >> This line of product development really scares me, particularly as it >> is a rather expensive product (I paid for full MC license plus >> renewal) comparing to either RB or CWP. I have my doubts about cutting >> off multiplatform features from cheaper licenses but I see this as Rev >> trying to maximize their income. I have no problems if the demo is >> restricted in terms of dynamic scripting. But the engine embedded when >> producing a standalone from a licensed environment could retain >> current limits. Since the limits are clearly kept as parameters, there >> must be ways to control them accordingly, including setting arbitrary >> values for specific projects (as I suggested). I had big and long-term >> plans for a number of MC-based projects, but the recent developments >> really make me wonder whether I bet on the right horse. > > Roger all that! Cripple the demo version. Keep things the way they > are for paid versions of Rev.
The script limits do not come into play so long as there is a licenced Home stack. -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Media Corporation Developer of WebMerge: Publish any database on any Web site ___________________________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com Tel: 323-225-3717 AIM: FourthWorldInc _______________________________________________ metacard mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
