On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 10:53 PM, Chipp Walters wrote:
OK,
to play the devils advocate here.
What IF (I have no such knowledge of this) Kevin and Scott said something
like:
In order to create the next generation: a new and much faster version of RR,
we're going to have to remove the 'set the script' command and treat
Transcript just as other compilers-- like C++, etc..
Would this make a difference?
I know this issue is dead.
But I have pondered this. I think, yes. But not for direct technological reasons. If RunRev can sell many times more, then maybe more resources can be applied to development and more users who desire the same as I desire will clammer for what I want. To put it another way, if removing the feature means growth, then the power of that feature (perhaps in another form) might be more likely to be there in the future.
The same thinking might apply to new features. A particular new-feature set might not include what I want, but it might improve sales to the point that I'm more likely to get what I want.
Of course, what I want might always be considered fringe, but maybe not.
I'd encourage Kevin to run with this product the best he can and in Kevin style. I think my best chance of getting the feature set I want is in that.
Dar Scott
_______________________________________________ metacard mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
