> Something wonderful has happened to me/us this week. > I've got a paying customer who wants to invest in the > development of a MetaCard-based authoring system like > MetaCard or RunRev, but it has to be even simpler than both > of these. Given that I'm the author of the current > incarnation of FreeGUI, e.g. a MetaCard-based clone of > HyperCard, it should not be surprising that I suggested > FreeGUI to this customer. He accepted! This means that he > will be investing money in the development of FreeGUI to make > it useable and easy enough for this customer's target > audience : administrators, teachers and students in 500 > schools in Quebec. No, it's not a typo, nor is it a mistake > ... *500* schools will be using it as early as this coming > summer (thousands of teachers and students). A total > breakthrough! :))
Will this be one application on one server or 500 separate installations. If it's the latter I assume that the customer will have to pay for 500 engine licenses, correct? The GUI may be free but doesn't the engine have to be paid for? I know some development tools specifically state you can't develop a product that is basically the same as the development tool. Does that apply in this case? Larry Huisingh _______________________________________________ metacard mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
