Hi all,
Ken Ray wrote:
On 8/22/06 3:10 AM, "Klaus Major" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Short question:
Since the ONLY new thing in the IDE will be support for UB on OS X,
is it OK to deliver/save it in 2.7 stack format???
It needs the 2.7x engine for UBs anyway!
Well, normally I'd say "Yes", but some of us may still be swapping
stacks
with older copies of MC for a short while, so if it's possible to
save in
the format the stack came in, and if someone tries to make a UB
standalone
out of a legacy format stack, alert the user that if they
continue, the
stack will be saved in 2.7 format.
I'm with Ken on this one: the older format lets us use the latest
IDE with either engine, but the new format limits it to only the
most recent engine. I do projects in both, and when I work in v2.7
I have it set up to save in the older format.
I would vote for imposing no limit that isn't absolutely necessary.
Saving in the older format allows a choice that the newer format
doesn't.
OK, OK, OK, poll finished, will deliver in "legacy" stack format :-)
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Media Corporation
___________________________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com
Regards
Klaus Major
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.major-k.de
_______________________________________________
metacard mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
