Hi

I wrote the code that does this so I thought I would chime in. I haven't done any work on the SB in either MC or Rev for a fair while now so things may have changed but comparing the revGetIcoFile function in the SB scripts (in rev it's in the revStandaloneSettings stack script which is not password protected) could give you a clue what has changed. Icons are very tricky to work with and changes to the engine and icons may have required changes to my code.

Cheers

--

Monte Goulding                                      BCompSci
Sweat Technologies                      BAppSci (Hons)

InstallGadget - How to create an installer in 10 seconds
Download now from: http://www.sweattechnologies.com/InstallGadget
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MetaCard List" <metacard@lists.runrev.com>
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 10:10 AM
Subject: Re: Can't assign App and Doc icons building stand alone


On 10/8/06 12:39 PM, "Klaus Major" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

just did a short test, and yes, 2.7.4 throws an error that the three
32 bit icons are
missing in the icon file, but they are definitively there!


How do you know that specifically? Is that what the error text is?

Did the test with MC, so it IS an engine issue.

The error text must be coming from the engine, since this error
string is
definitively NOT in the script of the standalone building routine of
MetaCard!

Well, if that's the case, then why does Rev 2.7.4 work, and MC 2.7.4
doesn't? They both use the same engine...

Could you please bugzilla thgis, Ken? Thanks.

I will certainly do this...


Ken Ray
Sons of Thunder Software
Web site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_______________________________________________
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard



_______________________________________________
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard

Reply via email to