> As it has been for y'all, I surmise, because respondents in this thread have > been unanimously favorable to Valentina. No one reported any regret. Not > so-far, anyways. I'd like to hear from other Valentina users too, or would-be > users that were discouraged.. or whomever has something relevant to say about > Valentina. Good or bad are equally welcome. :)
Actually, I'm not completely in the "yay-Valentina!" camp. ;-) I was working with a client on an application that was using Valentina as the DB, and it did not scale very well... we had a situation where my client's major customer couldn't get more than a few hours out of Val without it crashing. We worked with Ruslan almost daily for over a month and couldn't figure out what the issue was. We ended up switching to MySQL and have been happy as clams ever since. NOTE, however, that (a) we were using Valentina 1.x, not 2.x (which is supposed to be more stable/flexible/etc.), (b) we were not having any problems with our smaller customers (i.e. 2-20 concurrent users) but only had problems with the larger ones (50-150 concurrent users), and (c) Ruslan was INCREDIBLY responsible to us and was working with us daily, giving us custom builds, etc., so the support was excellent. I'm not sure any of the above applies to you, but just thought I'd bring it up. :-) Ken Ray Sons of Thunder Software, Inc. Email: [email protected] Web Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/ _______________________________________________ metacard mailing list [email protected] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
