Hi friends of the lean IDE :-)
I, too, prefer the MC IDE, as do the students in the lab, despite my
best efforts to get them to start with the Rev IDE (assuming that
they will prefer what they first learn, and that my preference is
the bias of my original MC learning). Nope, within a few months, I
find them using the MC IDE. When I ask why, the response is
typically along the lines of that quoted below: it doesn't get in
your way. Of course, we rarely build standalones, although that may
change as revlets take off.
On 18-Aug-09, at 11:00 AM, [email protected] wrote:
You are not alone in your preference, Shari. I'm sure that the Rev
IDE is
very clever (and I still use it to build standalones); I just like
the an
IDE that doesn't mess with the engine, customPropertySets and my
head.
/H
-----Original Message-----
Still here.
Still prefer the MC IDE.
Had to reinstall it from scratch and for a minute thought I was going
to have to post a Help Me but finally figured it out and am up and
running again.
Thank you that we still have the choice!
Shari
You're all welcome!
Of course I also use the MC IDE every day at work and at home.
And be assured, not long after Rev 4.0 comes out, I surely will release
a new MC IDE 4.0 with the new Revlet output!
You can all help me a bit by simply encouraging me!
After the release of the last IDE 3.5, the one with the complex
datagrid support,
I only got 1 (ONE/EINE/UNO/UN/EEN/UM) response/thank you/whatever, which
is a tad disappointing and not really meant to encourage a volunteer!
YO :-)
Best
Klaus
--
Klaus Major
http://www.major-k.de
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
metacard mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
