Well, I should get off my butt here. I agree that the metakit interface needs to be rewritten and I have started a swig'd version that is going slowly. The first pass is a "low-level" interface that acts like C++. If anyone wants to help me flesh it out, I'll start a sourceforge repository so we can make the second pass to be more pythonic.
Brian Kelley On 3/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ralf Schmitt schrieb: > > > > depending on the compiler and optimizations being used. > > In case it uses the "memcpy copy constructor", the _key member is being > > decrefed one too many times. > > > > > > I'll send another patch. > > Eagerly awaited! In the meantime I think I'll use your earlier patch, as it > doesn't cause segfaults here. > _____________________________________________ > Metakit mailing list - Metakit@equi4.com > http://www.equi4.com/mailman/listinfo/metakit > _____________________________________________ Metakit mailing list - Metakit@equi4.com http://www.equi4.com/mailman/listinfo/metakit
