I read several articles about uTP in the past few days. The only
problem that uTP can solve I understand so far is just evade from P2P
throttling by ISPs. OK, it is a great improvement for some people.
I don't see any motivation to implement such low level TCP like
protocol stack to user application.
It seems LibTorrent-rasterbar dev guys have started to implement uTP.
Let's wait for BitTorrent.inc guys to publish the detailed study about
how efficient and effective uTP  is compared to TCP.

On Nov 5, 12:49 am, Tatsuhiro <[email protected]> wrote:
> "The specs for uTP will eventually be open so other clients will have
> the opportunity to implement it too."
>
> The specs is closed...Let's wait and see how this new protocol works
> well..
>
> On Nov 4, 6:52 pm, "[email protected]"
>
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-2-0-to-elimininate-the-need-for-isp-...
>
> > “uTP measures the time a packet takes to get sent from peer A to peer
> > B, so in theory uTP will detect congestion anywhere on that path,
> > although in practice the congestion most often happens somewhere on
> > the first-mile uplink connection.”
> > So does this mean that the new uTorrent will result in slower download
> > times? Not necessarily. Since there is less congestion, uTorrent users
> > will experience no slowdowns in web-browsing, and ideally less
> > congestion and a more efficient use of the network may result in
> > faster download speeds. uTP is currently being tested in uTorrent v2.0
> > beta and thus far none of the testers have reported any significant
> > problems.
>
> > =======> I wait P4P instead of this ;)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metalink Discussion" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/metalink-discussion?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to