-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Anthony Bryan wrote:
> I just found an error in the ID schema, where the priority attribute
> of url/metaurl was required.
>
I fixed the same thing in 4.2.8 and 4.2.16.
I just thought how clients should treat URL if priority is missing.
If a Metalink contains URL with priority and URL without it, should
client assume that URL without it have lowest priority or opposite?
I also found metalink:logo and metalink:origin has metalinkUri construct
with parenthesis.
metalinkOrigin =
element metalink:origin {
metalinkCommonAttributes,
attribute dynamic { xsd:boolean }?,
(metalinkUri)
}
Other elements have not parenthesis.
metalinkMetaURL =
element metalink:metaurl {
metalinkCommonAttributes,
attribute priority { xsd:positiveInteger {
maxInclusive = "999999"}}?,
attribute type { text },
attribute name { text }?,
metalinkUri
}
I think this is not significant for validation. But should we remove
parenthesis?
Best regards,
Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
> I can only read this thing so many times before my eyes glaze :)
>
> so I encourage everyone to try the schema out, introduce errors in
> otherwise fine metalinks & see if the schema catches em.
>
> the latest schema can be found in the updated ID at
> http://metalinks.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/metalinks/internetdraft/
>
> but I'll attach it here along with a test metalink
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAksxuK4ACgkQfoQD1dZzw2Z3wACfcSMy/BY/d7RWEhqvN/2Gch9m
+4cAnjlZyWdzRDTHTFe7JoiOKb68nXbX
=erMM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Metalink Discussion" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/metalink-discussion?hl=en.
