On Tuesday, July 16, 2019 at 7:57:31 PM UTC+3, fl wrote: > > Just quote his opinion in the "Pedagogy" section after mine, the way a > good journalist in a good newspaper like the New York Times would quote > divergent opinions or experiences on a given subject. And this without > having to go into scientistic delusions like "evidence-based". >
Actually, Wikipedia wants secondary sources and not just someone's opinion. That's why I stopped contributing to it a long time ago. There are hordes of moderators which don't know a thing about subject but are trigger happy to remove anything suspicious. I just don't have so much time and motivation. But some professional researcher might have it all. I would just point out that he and I are not talking about the same > situation: he is talking about hundreds of hours he spent on his own on > set.mm, and I am talking about a group course to less motivated students. > I challenge any teacher to motivate his students by taking as a starting > point the hundreds of theorems of propositional logic in set.mm. > That guy who invented incredible.pm has a paper about such experiences. And he said something about 14 academic hours if I'm not mistaken. This counts as a scientific evidence, but not logical proof of course. Though, Wikipedia should be happy by this reference. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Metamath" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/c3dcca0a-0d2d-4e3f-9796-d0f999f3270a%40googlegroups.com.
