On October 19, 2019 3:46:06 PM EDT, 'Alexander van der Vekens' via Metamath 
<[email protected]> wrote:
>See also my comments on Banoit's remarks.
>I think we agree on providing additional class variables in general. So
>how 
>should we proceed? Shall we move all variables from Jonathan Ben-Naim's
>
>Mathbox to the main part? I think this would be too much (for the
>moment). 
>Maybe we could move the class variables with one and two primes ( A'
>,... , 
>A" , ...) , and with the indices 0 and 1 (A0, ..., A1, ...) first.

I think we should 1st agree on what should be moved, and then move them.

I'm a little leery of the indices, because there are other indices. We might 
eventually want to have a generalized way to write an index.

I propose that we start with the A' and A" collections (prime and double 
prime). What do others think?


--- David A.Wheeler

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metamath" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/A2D6F7BA-CB90-4785-9416-A4149C5FDE28%40dwheeler.com.

Reply via email to