Hi Filip, of course you can - I used classical proofs as guideline for my proofs of the friendship theorem (see Huneke's paper) and cramer's rule (see Wikipedia!). But it's only a "guideline" - there is (usually) much more work to do, searching for theorems or proving them to fill the gaps within the classical proofs.
Alexander On Wednesday, November 6, 2019 at 8:05:55 AM UTC+1, Filip Cernatescu wrote: > > Can we use classical math proof as guideline for proving formal metamath > theorems or formal proofs are totaly different? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Metamath" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/0b9412b0-59f2-4fc8-890a-f8ad370d5768%40googlegroups.com.
