I agree.  You can move these into the main part of set.mm.

On Sunday, December 29, 2019 at 9:59:24 AM UTC-5, Glauco wrote:
>
> I was checking if, recently, something similar to sum_ was added for 
> multiplication, and I found these sections in Scott Fenton's mathbox:
>
> 21.8.8 Complex products
> 21.8.9 Finite products
> 21.8.10 Infinite products
>
> Scott Fentons's comment for df-prod is
> "Define the product of a series with an index set of integers  A. This 
> definition takes most of the aspects of df-sum 13322 and adapts them for 
> multiplication instead of addition. However, we insist that in the infinite 
> case, there is a non-zero tail of the sequence. This ensures that the 
> convergence criteria match those of infinite sums."
>
> (but prod_ also handles effectively products "indexed" by generic finite 
> sets)
>
> I've written a few theorems based on Scott Fenton's definition and 
> theorems (only for finite products, for now) and it looks like we can 
> really build a complete library, similar to what's available for sum_ 
> (Scott already did most of the work)
>
> I keep finding proofs that require finite products (and, occasionally, 
> even infinite products), so I hope those sections could be promoted to the 
> main part. Of course, if Scott Fenton doesn't object (I don't know if he 
> expected to tweak some parts of those sections, I've only "tested" some 
> theorems of the finite product part and the section looks really well 
> written and useful)
>
>
> Glauco
>
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metamath" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/79eea029-e1c5-4746-be9c-9eebbbcd8e87%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to