On Monday, April 13, 2020 at 10:30:05 AM UTC-4, Benoit wrote:
>
> By the way, Norm: is upgrading to HTML 5 among your plans ?  I can't 
> estimate how much work it would be (both for the pages generated by the 
> metamath program and for the other pages, which can be done 
> independently).  I'm not advocating always updating to the most recent 
> version of anything, but HTML 5 is both more semantic and probably more 
> future proof.
>

There are currently no plans to do that.  It would be a big project.  I 
played with it several years ago, and it was difficult to get it to pass 
validation because of so many deprecated elements that would have to be 
moved to CSS among other things.  The main thing, though, is that I didn't 
see any HTML 5 feature that would offer an advantage for our pages, which 
are simple, clean, and fast loading.  It seemed like make-work without 
enough benefit to justify it.

(As an aside, it is very rare that I find a web page on other sites that 
isn't riddled with validation errors.  I've never understood why 
professional web developers tolerate this - imagine ignoring warnings from 
a compiler and depending on unpredictable code that might be generated.  
Validation has found many mistakes in our pages like malformed hrefs that 
otherwise would have to wait until someone noticed them.)

As for future-proofing, I may be wrong, but I don't see any point in the 
future where HTML 4 would no longer be supported by browsers.  There are 
simply too many web pages using it.  Even if everyone converted, there are 
still historical pages on archive.org, intended to last "forever", that 
would become unreadable.  I would guess the amount of extra browser code to 
support HTML 4 isn't that great, and it is already written and mostly bug 
free.  So there is no reason to stop supporting it.

Norm

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metamath" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/d959d150-6a5e-461a-859f-686affd6da58%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to