Hi David,
great work. I really like this presentation, because it is very precise, 
specific and complete, and it gives an illustrative impression of Metamath 
and mmj2.

I have only one remark:
* Slides 1 and 2: You do not "prove a geometric proof" - you either 
"formalize a geometric proof" or "formally prove a specific geometry 
theorem".

The rest seems to be perfect (I have to admit, however, that I did not go 
through slides 13-30 in detail...).

Regards,
Alexander


On Wednesday, July 15, 2020 at 3:06:08 AM UTC+2, David A. Wheeler wrote:
>
> I'd love to hear comments on my draft presentation 
> "Proving Geometric Proof Schwabhäuser 4.6 in Metamath Proof Explorer": 
>
> https://dwheeler.com/misc/Schwabhauser4.6.pptx 
>
> This presentation focuses on Schwabhäuser theorem (“Satz”) 4.6 
> as formalized by Thierry Arnoux in MPE theorem tgbtwnxfr ; it shows how 
> to recreate this proof using mmj2. My thanks to Thierry for his hard work! 
>
> I'd be especially interested in tips that would reduce what 
> you'd need to know or guess to create this proof beyond what's already 
> stated in Schwabhäuser. 
>
> --- David A. Wheeler 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metamath" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/d1d02c28-4dce-49f6-8f5b-80bfd9d0fcc5o%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to