> I guess "rarer" variables are usually used in statements which require a lot 
> of variables, and those typically have harder proofs. I was thinking about 
> replacing variables in already existing theorems (something like "|- ( ka -> 
> ka )" in case of id) and seeing if GPT-f has harder time proving these "new" 
> formulations. That way proof difficulty is left the same, since it's 
> essentially the same statement.

Got it. This is indeed an interesting experiment that could be run on
a few hundreds theorem statements  :+1:

-stan

On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 8:27 AM savask <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Concerning stats on the performance of GPT-f based on
>> variables contained in theorem, I unfortunately don't have numbers
>> available but I can probably try to run them. Though I'm not sure how
>> useful that would be as I presume there is correlation between
>> difficulty and appearance of specific variable names?
>
>
> I guess "rarer" variables are usually used in statements which require a lot 
> of variables, and those typically have harder proofs. I was thinking about 
> replacing variables in already existing theorems (something like "|- ( ka -> 
> ka )" in case of id) and seeing if GPT-f has harder time proving these "new" 
> formulations. That way proof difficulty is left the same, since it's 
> essentially the same statement.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Metamath" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/63139c24-6fca-4b5e-bb6d-ee497e146874o%40googlegroups.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metamath" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/CACZd_0wavMdc4PFjN-cPL%2Bd04aF3_T%2B6jTRCv6Nc_JJD%2BLt%3DGw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to