The conventions are fine for me (they can/should be added to the ~conventions if nobody objects) , and I had only a small merge conflict ;-). Alexander
On Sunday, March 21, 2021 at 11:57:25 AM UTC+1 Benoit wrote: > I was aiming for consistency with what seemed most common, maybe a bit too > obsessively ! I hope this did not create merge conflicts with your recent > PR. > > Whatever is decied, I can add it to ~conventions. > > Benoît > > On Sunday, March 21, 2021 at 10:21:26 AM UTC+1 Alexander van der Vekens > wrote: > >> Recently, Benoît performed some reformattings of the section headers in >> set.mm. It seems that there are the following (hidden) conventions: >> >> * two empty lines before a section header (after a theorem) >> * indentation of the section header comment by two spaces >> >> If these are/shall become official conventions, they should be documented >> in section "Conventions" (which does not, by the way, obey the second >> rule). >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Metamath" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/94339b2c-7116-48a6-ac7e-40ced34de50fn%40googlegroups.com.
