Exciting! How is the performance? I would guess that a Zig verifier could
compete with the best.

On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 10:51 AM Marnix Klooster <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> In case anyone is interested, I'm not sure but I don't think I announced
> this earlier: Since almost a year I've been working on and mostly-off on a
> Metamath verifier in Zig (https://ziglang.org).  And today I've reached
> the milestone of supporting the last missing feature (except for allowing
> '?' in a proof, which is not really important for me yet).
>
> The code is at https://github.com/marnix/zigmmverify; any feedback is
> welcome.
>
> Groetjes,
>  <><
> Marnix
> --
> Marnix Klooster
> [email protected]
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Metamath" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/CAF7V2P_C7QcKP8b_rxvEO6e5uXTMpS6gySU-iVCiqLD1gCW5qQ%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/CAF7V2P_C7QcKP8b_rxvEO6e5uXTMpS6gySU-iVCiqLD1gCW5qQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metamath" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/CAFXXJSvqg4vHT%2B4HmaBhHSMCTdE0-EX0vRyVr6_tn%3DYFGgJmGA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to