On Sunday, June 20, 2021 at 12:01:38 PM UTC+2 Alexander van der Vekens 
wrote:

> I started to prove some theorems for Fermat numbers, but I got stuck 
> because I need the "second supplement to the law of quadratic reciprocity", 
> i.e the value of the Legendre/Kronecker symbol for 2. The theorem is 
> available in set.mm ( ~2lgs), but unfortunately without proof (and 
> commented out). 
>

I could prove ~2lgs now - it's available in the latest version of set.mm.


> I think Gauss' Lemma is required for the proof, which could be (formally) 
> stated as follows: 
>
> Let p be an odd prime and a an integer which is not divisible by p. Let 
> S={a,2a,3a,...,(p-1)a/2}. Let n denote the number of elements of S whose 
> least positive residue modulo p is greater than p/2. Then ( a | p )  = 
> (-1)^n.
>
> gausslemma $p |- ( ( ( P e. Prime /\ -. 2 || P ) /\ ( A e. ZZ /\ -. P || A 
> )
>                                       /\ N = ( # ` { x e. ZZ | E. i e. ( 1 
> ... ( ( P - 1 ) / 2 ) ) 
>                                                                            
> ( x = ( i x. A ) /\ ( P / 2 ) < ( x mod P ) ) } ) )
>                                   -> ( A /L P ) = ( -u 1 ^ N ) ) $=
>     ? $.
>
> I succeeded already in proving ~2lg on base of ~ gausslemma (with A = 2), 
> but to prove ~gausslemma would still be tedious (see, for example 
> https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Gauss%27s_Lemma_(Number_Theory) ). 
>
> I proved the special case of Gauss' lemma (for A = 2, see ~ gausslemma2d 
), which was sufficient to prove ~2lgs. The general version of Gauss' lemma 
is still  unproven. If anybody wants to prove it, the theorem is available 
as ~gausslemma in set.mm (commented out).

Is there an alternate way to proof ~2lg? Is there a simple proof for 
> ~gausslemma? Which theorems are already available in set.mm which could 
> help to finish the proofs for ~2lg and ~gausslemma?
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metamath" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/cc9a1cbe-5138-44d6-9c57-dd172791eb5bn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to