On Monday, January 3, 2022 at 7:21:20 AM UTC+1 [email protected] wrote:

> I think we're all agreed that a bot would be better (although I now see 
> there would be more than one way to write it). I'm not trying to discourage 
> anyone from making a bot happen at all.
>
I agree with Jim and Mario.  I view the current CI check as a temporary 
solution before the solution described by Mario is implemented.  The 
discussion can be continued at 
https://github.com/metamath/set.mm/issues/2381

BenoƮt

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metamath" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/99a5752e-e609-44af-9704-d83643680bd5n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to