I suppose we should document "t" as meaning closed form (although it is far 
less common than no suffix). We perhaps could get rid of "t" with a modest 
amount of renaming (as far as I could tell from "show label *t"), although when 
I look at something like all the *19.21* theorems, finding good names for 
everything might be a touch complicated.

On April 11, 2022 4:29:08 AM PDT, 'Alexander van der Vekens' via Metamath 
<[email protected]> wrote:
>There is a post of Norm 
>(https://groups.google.com/g/metamath/c/JWm26Y9qD-g/m/nhe6f87bBQAJ) withn 
>the following statement:
>
>"Suffixes "i", "d", "t" mean inference, deduction, and closed theorem 
>versions as usual."
>
>Unfortunately, there is no hint what "as usual" means/refers to.
>
>On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 1:17:27 PM UTC+2 Alexander van der Vekens 
>wrote:
>
>> I noticed that there are many theorems with labels ending with "t", having 
>> a statement like "Closed form of ..." in their comments. For example ~trut: 
>> " A proposition is equivalent to it being implied by ` T. ` .  Closed form 
>> of ~ trud . ...".
>>
>> In the "conventions", it is written that theorems in closed form should 
>> not have a special suffix, or should have suffix "g" in special cases. A 
>> suffix "t" is not mentioned in the conventions.
>>
>> What does the "t" stand for? Should it be removed to follow the 
>> conventions, or should the conventions be enhanced? In which cases a suffix 
>> "t" should be used, and in which cases no special suffix?
>>
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>"Metamath" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>email to [email protected].
>To view this discussion on the web visit 
>https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/102ed4fd-654c-4acb-9633-34f194d7e96dn%40googlegroups.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metamath" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/6468E5E1-68E9-48CF-B220-81C16678CE8C%40panix.com.

Reply via email to