I'm sure you meant to say, "this is one of the reasons Raph started working
on Ghilbert, then I shamelessly copied that approach for MM0."

:)

R


On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 10:19 PM Mario Carneiro <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 1:15 AM Jim Kingdon <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 5/31/22 17:34, Mario Carneiro wrote:
>>
>> > I don't think proliferation of verifiers is a problem at all. I would
>> > like to see metamath verifiers on Rosetta Code and written in 200
>> > languages. It's a weekend project so it doesn't have the same risks
>> > unless you want to start adding fancy features like math parsing or
>> > markup rendering, or anything that is not just read-only on the mm file.
>>
>> Hmm, by that criteria a second implementation of the definition checker
>> would seem to be "fancy".
>>
>> Which is too bad, in the sense that it is (at least to my way of
>> thinking) part of the "kernel" in the sense of being needed to confirm
>> soundness.
>>
>
> It is fancy, and it is too bad that this is the case. If you recall this
> is one of the reasons I started working on MM0, the definition checker is
> way too important to be bolted on the side like it is in metamath.
>
> Mario
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Metamath" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/CAFXXJSuQ559xCk2qjneXbJqGJLFBuWghfb4iYCegafPQMp4fdA%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/CAFXXJSuQ559xCk2qjneXbJqGJLFBuWghfb4iYCegafPQMp4fdA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metamath" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/CADBEgNM2sdok8CQ4o6DGdAgM%2BNPEmrN7nXz%3DhGdd_Fjr14FgTg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to