I agree with your proposals.
BenoƮt
On Thursday, July 14, 2022 at 7:16:37 AM UTC+2 Alexander van der Vekens 
wrote:

> I want to take up a topic raised by Norm in 2014 about using upper case in 
> labels, see 
> https://groups.google.com/g/metamath/c/Z_ERHq4knJg/m/cbUarfKEQqoJ):
>
>
>
> *I notice that you use upper case in some labels. So far, almost all 
> labels are lower case for ease of typing, although this is the convention 
> more than a prohibition. Others may wish to discuss this.*
> From my point of view, we should have such a convention, and we should 
> document this in the "Convention" section 17.1.1 in set.mm ("theorem" ~ 
> conventions-label <http://us2.metamath.org/mpeuni/conventions-label.html>
> ).
>
> There are, however, documented exceptions: the suffixes  OLD, ALT and 
> ALTV.
>
> Another, not yet documented exception is using the suffix "N" for theorems 
> with tag "(New usage is discouraged.)" (593 occurrences in set.mm, but 
> all in Norm's mathbox). I would suggest that this is OK in mathboxes, but 
> should not be used in the main body of set.mm.
>
> Maybe upper case should be allowed in mathboxes in genereal (see also 
> ~rntrclfvOAI), but not in the main body (except the above mentioned 
> exceptions).
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metamath" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/9803cb19-e49f-4987-a573-4a0da1580376n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to