As a remainder, none of my contributions have yet been merged. I created a pull 
request <https://github.com/metamath/metamath-website-seed/pull/1> to 
@metamath/metamath-website-seed 
<https://github.com/metamath/metamath-website-seed> as well. My commits 
were accepted by Mario just minutes afterwards, but neither were they 
merged, nor has Metamath's pmproof.txt 
<https://us.metamath.org/mmsolitaire/pmproofs.txt> been updated by now. A 
separate mail to David triggered no response.
Does nobody with access feel responsible for the mmsolitaire project?

— Samiro Discher 

Samiro Discher schrieb am Donnerstag, 6. Oktober 2022 um 21:50:28 UTC+2:

> I'd like to contribute my findings to 
> https://us.metamath.org/mmsolitaire/pmproofs.txt.
>
> I found several (17) shorter proofs. See 'pmproofs.txt' at 
> https://github.com/xamidi/mmsolitaire [changes: 2be2349 
> <https://github.com/xamidi/mmsolitaire/commit/2be2349a5621eaaee5d5940e98202bd265c9d50a>
> ]:
> *2.62:      89 ->   77
> *3.31:     103 ->   83
> *3.43:     137 ->  117
> *3.44:     203 ->  183
> *4.14:     321 ->  283
> *4.32:     355 ->  317
> *4.39:     609 ->  479
> *4.41:     271 ->  249
> *4.76:     271 ->  249
> *4.77:     375 ->  287
> *4.86:     617 ->  557
> *4.87:     523 ->  447
> *5.31:     119 ->  109
> *5.6:      203 ->  167
> *5.75:     387 ->  351
> meredith:  145 ->  141
> biass:    2127 -> 1883
>
> Furthermore, I modified another 26 proofs such that all subproofs of the 
> same formula (ranging over the whole collection) are equal (preferring the 
> lexicographically 
> smaller proof strings). See 'pmproofs-unified.txt'. Feel free to use its 
> contents if desired. I find that property useful since this way, there are 
> no redundant proofs when parsing the collection, which saves time and space 
> and determines ideal and unique references. To showcase this, I uploaded 
> example files of the parsed collections to 
> https://github.com/xamidi/mmsolitaire/tree/master/data. The string 
> "pmproofs_*n*" in a filename indicates that helper proofs are referenced 
> for parts that are used in at least *n* different proofs.
>
> My findings were assisted by a custom tool I wrote in C++ (still a private 
> GitHub repo for assisting my research), and I have – If I didn't mess 
> something up – exhaustively searched all proofs up to a length of 29 steps.
>
> — Samiro Discher
>
> PS: The contact information on the Metamath website and in pmproofs.txt is 
> still of Dr. Norman Megill. At first I tried to use it despite him being 
> deceased, and got no respone from anyone.
>
> PPS: Is there a way I can add a non-Google mail address to this mailing 
> list?
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metamath" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/60335b00-a53d-4716-a91a-0c959c1ad9a5n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to