Done in https://github.com/metamath/set.mm/pull/3027
That proof had actually been deprecated to 0nnnOLD so I converted it to 
0nnnALT to be able to use it in nnne0ALT.

Benoît

On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 12:47:21 PM UTC+1 Benoit wrote:

> The original proof is:
>
> !SHOW PROOF 0nnn
>  8   mt2.1=0lt1   $p |- 0 < 1
> 10   mt2.2=nnnlt1 $p |- ( 0 e. NN -> -. 0 < 1 )
> 11 0nnn=mt2     $p |- -. 0 e. NN
>
> so I'm going to add it as 0nnnALT and use 0nnnALT in nnne0ALT.
>
> Benoît
>
> On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 2:33:36 AM UTC+1 [email protected] 
> wrote:
>
>> For what it's worth, here's some git history: 
>>
>> $ git log -L '/nnne0ALT \$p/,+1:set.mm' 
>>
>> commit df12e3e7168f44afd3771b5aba5286a66f1ae8f6 
>> Author: Steven Nguyen <[email protected]> 
>> Date: Tue Jan 31 14:18:36 2023 -0600 
>>
>> rename equsb3lem et al to equsb3v et al, rmv ax-mulgt0 from 0nnn (#3018) 
>>
>> * rename equsb3lem et al to equsb3v et al, rmv ax-mulgt0 from nnnn0 
>> also reduces ax-13 from the renamed elsb3v and elsb4v 
>>
>> I wonder how many of these improvements to set.mm transfer to iset.mm 
>>
>> * rewrap 
>>
>> * rmv elsb3vOLD + elsb4vOLD 
>> tag drift 
>>
>> diff --git a/set.mm b/set.mm 
>> --- a/set.mm 
>> +++ b/set.mm 
>> @@ -121870,2 +121896,1 @@ 
>> - $( A positive integer is nonzero. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-1999.) $) 
>> - nnne0 $p |- ( A e. NN -> A =/= 0 ) $= 
>> + nnne0ALT $p |- ( A e. NN -> A =/= 0 ) $= 
>>
>> commit 98e1d43acb1e96b6ca2010bd83fa2894032074ee 
>> Author: nmegill <[email protected]> 
>> Date: Mon Oct 15 19:55:51 2018 -0400 
>>
>> set.mm - change 'natural number' to 'positive integer' in NN comments 
>>
>> diff --git a/set.mm b/set.mm 
>> --- a/set.mm 
>> +++ b/set.mm 
>> @@ -119172,2 +119173,2 @@ 
>> - $( A natural number is nonzero. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-1999.) $) 
>> + $( A positive integer is nonzero. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-1999.) $) 
>> nnne0 $p |- ( A e. NN -> A =/= 0 ) $= 
>>
>> commit c5fe509062dcca53a4d0572a71c953d5bd27d4a1 
>> Author: Norm <[email protected]> 
>> Date: Thu Nov 5 13:08:37 2015 -0500 
>>
>> Handed to Mario to identify missing contributors 
>>
>> diff --git a/set.mm b/set.mm 
>> --- a/set.mm 
>> +++ b/set.mm 
>> @@ -112270,2 +116100,2 @@ 
>> - $( A natural number is nonzero. $) 
>> + $( A natural number is nonzero. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-1999.) $) 
>> nnne0 $p |- ( A e. NN -> A =/= 0 ) $= 
>>
>> commit 0d2cf5049823b116baad01ff6be6481219113d8e 
>> Author: Norm <[email protected]> 
>> Date: Tue May 12 09:14:21 2015 -0400 
>>
>> stable release, archive name set.mm.2011-06-27 
>>
>> diff --git a/set.mm b/set.mm 
>> --- a/set.mm 
>> +++ b/set.mm 
>> @@ -69477,2 +71839,2 @@ 
>> - $( A natural number is non-zero. $) 
>> + $( A natural number is nonzero. $) 
>> nnne0 $p |- ( A e. NN -> A =/= 0 ) $= 
>>
>> commit 45f6474f112a5cf2d76cd1aaf659be990bff61c5 
>> Author: Norm <[email protected]> 
>> Date: Tue May 12 09:14:16 2015 -0400 
>>
>> stable release, archive name set.mm.2010-08-29 
>>
>> diff --git a/set.mm b/set.mm 
>> --- a/set.mm 
>> +++ b/set.mm 
>> @@ -67129,0 +69477,2 @@ 
>> + $( A natural number is non-zero. $) 
>> + nnne0 $p |- ( A e. NN -> A =/= 0 ) $= 
>>
>> Mario Carneiro <[email protected]> wrote: 
>> > It sounds like we were unable to prevent a proof modification in this 
>> case. 
>> > We'll have to go back through the history to find out what the original 
>> > proof was and how it degenerated. 
>> > 
>> > On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 12:54 PM Zheng Fan <[email protected]> 
>> wrote: 
>> > 
>> > > The proof of nnne0ALT is a thin wrapper of 0nnn, which is in turn a 
>> thin 
>> > > wrapper of nnne0, which makes me think why this alternative proof is 
>> kept. 
>> > > The caption says that it is supposed to be a shorter proof using more 
>> > > axioms, but it seems not the case, at least for the current version 
>> of 
>> > > set.mm. 
>> > > 
>> > > -- 
>> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> Groups 
>> > > "Metamath" group. 
>> > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>> send an 
>> > > email to [email protected]. 
>> > > To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> > > 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/65b3f52c-17c8-42c5-8349-582f2ff86bd8n%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> > > <
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/65b3f52c-17c8-42c5-8349-582f2ff86bd8n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>  
>>
>> > > . 
>> > > 
>>
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metamath" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/9cb2ce8a-052c-4ef3-90fc-bfb339de4396n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to