IIRC metamath.exe has a mechanism to show the length of such a proof, but not to calculate the proof itself. Note that these proofs get really ridiculously long (I think you need bignum arithmetic just to determine how many lines of proof there would be), so it's not practical outside toy problems.
On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 8:29 PM Guram Mikaberidze < [email protected]> wrote: > I am wondering if there is a way to display full RPN proof of an assertion > in set.mm without relying on any previously proved theorems. I would like > instead to include the proofs of the used theorems in the final RPN, which > would only reference the axioms. > > --Guga > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Metamath" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/701e744f-a297-4ce4-94b5-66bf24b4991an%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/701e744f-a297-4ce4-94b5-66bf24b4991an%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Metamath" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/CAFXXJSvXTAriwhD0Otmr-ewngctpna8b60LnaRQgjAuG_DcHaA%40mail.gmail.com.
