Thank you both!

Op woensdag 19 april 2023 om 10:11:17 UTC+2 schreef [email protected]:

> It could be proved with https://us.metamath.org/mpeuni/biimpri.html , for 
> example:
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 1 | : elnnz1    | |- ( A e. NN <-> ( A e. ZZ /\ 1 <_ A ) )
> 2 | 1 : biimpri | |- ( ( A e. ZZ /\ 1 <_ A ) -> A e. NN )
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> aenn $p |- ( ( A e. ZZ /\ 1 <_ A ) -> A e. NN ) $= ( cn wcel cz c1 cle wbr 
> wa elnnz1 biimpri ) ABCADCEAFGHAIJ $.
>
> -
> Igor
>
> On Wednesday, April 19, 2023 at 5:17:38 AM UTC+2 [email protected] wrote:
>
>> The most relevant theorem appears to be 
>> https://us.metamath.org/mpeuni/elnnz1.html . In general, you should try 
>> to look for biconditional statements as well, because we try to prove 
>> biconditionals when possible, and instead rely on versions of modus ponens 
>> that build in some kind of biconditional elimination to make them easy to 
>> use. You would apply it using something like 
>> https://us.metamath.org/mpeuni/sylibr.html or 
>> https://us.metamath.org/mpeuni/sylanbrc.html .
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 11:11 PM LM <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> what is most set.mm-fitting way to prove:
>>>
>>> ( ( A e. ZZ /\ 1 <_ A ) -> A e. NN )
>>>
>>> ?
>>>
>>> Grepping through set.mm I only find " e. NN " on antecedent side, never 
>>> on consequent side.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "Metamath" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/7a3251c5-87bd-4d95-9db0-6198cad47f43n%40googlegroups.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/7a3251c5-87bd-4d95-9db0-6198cad47f43n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metamath" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/23566d12-1d4b-4bb1-94c0-36ad0d307f86n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to