the reason why this needs to be done, is to avoid having to go through all 
the definitions before the so-called "target" node one wants to learn. say 
I wish to learn the definition df-grp.. it is the 400+th definition in 
set.mm... so it makes sense to isolate the subgraph on which it is 
dependent only, to avoid having to learn 400+ definitions first before 
reaching df-grp...

On Thursday, June 8, 2023 at 3:49:52 PM UTC+8 Humanities Clinic wrote:

> also may I ask.. because there are 1000+ over definitions... and for some 
> definition node X, not every node that comes before it in a topological 
> sort is used to define node X.. it is therefore possible to isolate a 
> subgraph of only those nodes that node X is dependent on... do u have a 
> suggestion on how this can be done quickly, preferably on set.mm 
> directly? 
>
> On Thursday, June 8, 2023 at 1:40:34 PM UTC+8 Humanities Clinic wrote:
>
>> *from the ground up
>>
>> On Thursday, June 8, 2023 at 1:38:57 PM UTC+8 Humanities Clinic wrote:
>>
>>> erm sorry to ask, but will it take long? because I need it for work and 
>>> teaching.. the definitions graph, when topologically sorted, can be used to 
>>> learn all definitions of objects from the group up..
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, June 7, 2023 at 12:47:53 PM UTC+8 Humanities Clinic wrote:
>>>
>>>> Noted, may I know if the definitions graph have been added? I don't see 
>>>> any news yet..
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, June 7, 2023 at 6:05:21 AM UTC+8 Thierry Arnoux wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yes, the PR has not been merged in yet, so until then you will need 
>>>>> check my branch out.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This feature required an "XML" library and I've kept it optional, so 
>>>>> you will only be able to access it if the program is compiled with the 
>>>>> "xml" feature, like so:
>>>>>
>>>>> cargo run --features xml -- ../set.mm/set.mm --time 
>>>>> --export-graphml-deps deps.graphml
>>>>>
>>>>> Or 
>>>>>
>>>>> cargo build --features xml
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, I should have mentioned that.
>>>>> _
>>>>> Thierry
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/06/2023 14:17, Humanities Clinic wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I even tried downloading the specific fork/branch directly, and still 
>>>>> have the same problem: 
>>>>>
>>>>> git clone https://github.com/tirix/metamath-knife.git 
>>>>> export_graphml_deps
>>>>>
>>>>> Cloning into 'export_graphml_deps'...
>>>>>
>>>>> remote: Enumerating objects: 2377, done.
>>>>>
>>>>> remote: Counting objects: 100% (645/645), done.
>>>>>
>>>>> remote: Compressing objects: 100% (175/175), done.
>>>>>
>>>>> remote: Total 2377 (delta 523), reused 526 (delta 466), pack-reused 
>>>>> 1732
>>>>>
>>>>> Receiving objects: 100% (2377/2377), 20.79 MiB | 6.67 MiB/s, done.
>>>>>
>>>>> Resolving deltas: 100% (1704/1704), done.
>>>>>
>>>>> Users-MacBook-Pro-5:checkouts user$ cd 
>>>>> /Users/user/.cargo/git/checkouts/export_graphml_deps 
>>>>>
>>>>> Users-MacBook-Pro-5:export_graphml_deps user$ cargo build --release
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Monday, June 5, 2023 at 8:15:51 PM UTC+8 Humanities Clinic wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for this. Is it me, or is there something not quite right 
>>>>>> with the new PR. I keep on getting the error: 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *error:* Found argument '--export-graphml-deps' which wasn't 
>>>>>> expected, or isn't valid in this context
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did you mean --export?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> USAGE:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     metamath-knife <DATABASE> --export <LABEL>... --time
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For more information try --help
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Monday, June 5, 2023 at 7:47:29 AM UTC+8 David A. Wheeler wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > On Jun 4, 2023, at 9:14 AM, Humanities Clinic <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: 
>>>>>>> > 
>>>>>>> > I am stating more specifically the goals I have in mind when I 
>>>>>>> asked: 
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/CAFXXJSvQt6D6xoufTE5%2BbvyKmfUVN0R0AZK0Ch_7qfLbR95Duw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> > 
>>>>>>> > I need to explore the "graph" of statements in set.mm. 
>>>>>>> Specifically, I need to (1) find all sinks and sources quickly (2) 
>>>>>>> Isolate 
>>>>>>> one walk/path/trail between two specified nodes (3a) MOST IMPORTANTLY: 
>>>>>>> With 
>>>>>>> arrow keys on the keyboard, navigate between adjacent nodes. Up arrow - 
>>>>>>> for 
>>>>>>> the parent of the node. Down arrow - for the child of the node. Left 
>>>>>>> and 
>>>>>>> right arrows - for the siblings of the node (3b) I need to explore the 
>>>>>>> subgraph of (only) all definitions in the way outlined in (3a), so I 
>>>>>>> need 
>>>>>>> to be able isolate this subgraph from the entire graph. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think building on Thierry's code will get you there. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's a different visualization, but you might also be interested in 
>>>>>>> my video "Metamath Proof Explorer (set.mm) contributions visualized 
>>>>>>> with Gource through 2020-04-29" at <
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVGSeDjWzUo>. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This video shows the set.mm database's structure and growth over 
>>>>>>> time. Each little circle represents an assertion (mostly theorems). 
>>>>>>> It's 
>>>>>>> structured by section and subsection, not by internal theorem 
>>>>>>> dependencies. 
>>>>>>> Even so, it may be of interest to you. The code to generate this is all 
>>>>>>> publicly available. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --- David A. Wheeler 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "Metamath" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>>
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/5d59c6af-a1e8-4a32-bfb1-85077310a17bn%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/5d59c6af-a1e8-4a32-bfb1-85077310a17bn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metamath" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/3eedc288-8f71-46cf-8c51-7e83b3efbc73n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to