yep, quem produz tambem produz responsabilidades. tou com o saco cheio dessa
tirada de corpinho que estes elefantes industriais andam fazendo. pois onde
pisam f0de tudo!

mas tambem nos colocarmos nesta balanca: quanto consumimosXquantoproduzimos
?? quanto(s) produzimos X quanto(s) consumimos???

internacional ?? pow, mas nao 'produzimos' as fronteiras tambem?

siga rima.

mbraz

2007/12/18, Çtalker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> VAMOS COMEÇAR UM MOVIMENTO INTERNACIONAL PELA RESPONSABILIZAÇÃO
> FINANCEIRA DAS TRANSNACIONAIS PELOS RESULTADOS DA OBSOLESCÊNCIA
> PROGRAMADA!
>
> Felipe Fonseca escreveu:
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: DeeDee Halleck
> > Date: Dec 16, 2007 12:10 AM
> > Subject: <nettime> E-Waste
> >
> >
> > Please post.
> >
> > Thought net-times might be interested in this.
> >
> > xx
> >
> > DeeDee
> >
> >
> >
> > E-Wasting Away in China
> >
> > by Terry J. Allen,
> > In These Times column
> > The highway of poisoned products that runs from China to the United
> > States is not a one-way street. America ships China up to 80 percent
> > of U.S. electronic waste discarded computers, cell phones, TVs, etc.
> > Last year alone, the United States exported enough e-waste to cover a
> > football field and rise a mile into the sky.
> >
> > So while the media ride their new lead-painted hobbyhorse the danger
> > of Chinese wares spare a thought for Chinese workers dying to dispose
> > of millions of tons of our toxic crap.
> >
> > Most of the junk ends up in the small port city of Guiyu, a one-
> > industry town four hours from Hong Kong that reeks of acid fumes and
> > burning plastic. Its narrow streets are lined with 5,500 small-scale
> > scavenger enterprises euphemistically called ?recyclers.? They employ
> > 80 percent of the town?s families more than 30,000 people who recover
> > copper, gold and other valuable materials from 15 million tons of e-
> > waste.
> >
> > Unmasked and ungloved, Guiyu?s workers dip motherboards into acid
> > baths, shred and grind plastic casings from monitors, and grill
> > components over open coal fires. They expose themselves to brain-
> > damaging, lung-burning, carcinogenic, birth-defect- inducing toxins
> > such as lead, mercury, cadmium and bromated flame retardants (the
> > subject of last month?s column), as well as to dioxin at levels up to
> > 56 times World Health Organization standards. Some 82 percent of
> > children under 6 around Guiyu have lead poisoning.
> >
> > While workers reap $1 to $3 a day and an early death, the ?recycling?
> > industry in both the United States and China harvests substantial
> > profits. U.S. exporters not only avoid the cost of environmentally
> > sound disposal at home, but they also turn a buck from selling the
> > waste abroad. After disassembly, one ton of computer scrap yields
> > more gold than 17 tons of gold ore, and circuit boards can be 40
> > times richer in copper than copper ore. In Guiyu alone, workers
> > extract 5 tons of gold, 1 ton of silver and an estimated $150 million
> > a year.
> >
> > Many U.S. exporters pose as recyclers rather than dumpers. But a 2005
> > Government Accountability Office report found that ?it is difficult
> > to verify that exported used electronics are actually destined for
> > reuse, or that they are ultimately managed responsibly once they
> > leave U.S. shores.?
> >
> > This dumping of toxic waste by developed countries onto developing
> > ones is illegal under the Basel Convention, a 1992 international
> > treaty that was ratified by every industrialized nation except the
> > United States.
> >
> > Unhindered by international law and unmonitored by Washington, U.S.
> > brokers simply label e-waste ?recyclable? and ship it somewhere with
> > lax environmental laws, corrupt officials and desperately poor
> > workers. China has all three. And a packing case with a 100-dollar
> > bill taped to it slips as easily as an eel through Guiyu?s ports.
> >
> > E-waste fills a neat niche in the U.S.-China trade. America?s
> > insatiable appetite for cheap Chinese goods has created a trade
> > deficit that topped $233 billion last year. While e-waste does little
> > to redress the financial disparity, it helps ensure that the
> > container vessels carrying merchandise to Wal-Mart?s shelves do not
> > return empty to China.
> >
> > In the 19th century, England faced a similarly massive deficit with
> > China until a different kind of junk opium allowed it to complete the
> > lucrative England-India-China trade triangle.
> >
> > Britain, after destroying India?s indigenous textile industry and
> > impoverishing local weavers, flooded its colony with English textiles
> > carried on English ships. The British East India Company fleet then
> > traveled to China to buy tea, silk and other commodities to sate
> > Europe?s appetites for ?exotic? luxuries. But since there was little
> > the Chinese wanted from either India or Europe, the ships traveled
> > light and profitless on the India-China side of the triangle. That
> > is, until England forced Indian peasants to grow opium and, in the
> > process, precipitate mass starvation by diverting cultivable land.
> >
> > The trade fleet then filled up with opium and pushed it to China
> > through the port of Canton. Since opium was illegal in China, Britain
> > started a war in 1839 to force Peking to accept the drug. By 1905,
> > more than a quarter of China?s male population was addicted.
> >
> > Now it is Americans who are addicted to Chinese junk. And our own
> > government policies and corporations are the ones stoking the jones.
> > Slick marketing and consumer fetishism push Americans to buy the
> > latest, lightest, biggest, smallest, fastest, trendiest items. And
> > even if you are not hooked on the latest gadgets, repairs or upgrades
> > are impractical. The half billion computers we trashed in the last
> > decade have to go somewhere, and shipping them to China and other
> > poor nations is a win-win solution for Chinese and U.S. industry.
> >
> > As for the populations of both countries, we can feast on the irony
> > that the same ships that carry toxic toys and food ingredients to
> > Americans return bearing deadly e-waste for the Chinese.
> >
> > Terry Allen
> > phone  802.229.0303
> > cell       212.691.1145
> > www.terryjallen.com
> >
> >
> >
> > www.deedeehalleck.blogspot.com
> > www.deepdishwavesofchange.blogspot.com
> >
> >
> > #  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
> > #  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
> > #  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
> > #  more info: http://mail.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
> > #  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lista de discussão da MetaReciclagem
> Envie mensagens para [email protected]
> http://lista.metareciclagem.org
>



-- 
൬βռăʒ

--> Yeats: "Mirror on mirror mirrored is all the show."
--> Flusser: "Espelho por espelho espelhado e' todo o espetaculo."
_______________________________________________
Lista de discussão da MetaReciclagem
Envie mensagens para [email protected]
http://lista.metareciclagem.org

Responder a