Dear Rob, List; I think that John and most list members would agree that one does not go to the "big dance" with the sole purpose of only dancing with the most beautiful ladies. The fun is getting to know all of the participants (good, bad, or ugly). I enjoy a good Nantan or Campo as well as a Zagami specimen, and the Nantan's and Campo's are a whole lot more common, more forgiving if dropped on the carpet, and easier to replace if lost.
Science is the base for study, but the Mohamed's, Frass's, and Schimpf's make it a little bit more exciting. If we all wore green every day, it would soon become very boring. Meteorites and meteorite collectors are the same way (well maybe not THAT way) for me. Meteorites are rare, fascinating, and quite interesting, as are all of those who collect them. Even meteorwrongs and those who collect and sell them have a lesson for us all. If we only stuck to science, half of the list would dry up and blow away. To put it another way, debutantes are boring (just ask Jeff Foxworthy). Signed, Dave (Ernest T. Bass) Freeman John Gwilliam wrote: > At 11:06 AM 2/21/02 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Hello everyone. As a neophyte to the study of meteorites, I joined >> the mailing list to get a perspective on what is currently happening. >> I've learned alot in a few short days but I see the rhetoric, at >> times, like elsewhere, can be Piled High and Deep. Rob. > > > If you joined this List thinking that instinctual human behavior and > egos might not exist here, you're in for a surprise. However, in spite > of the rhetoric and sometimes knee-high piling, it is a very > informative place to learn a lot about meteorites. > > Welcome, > > John Gwilliam > John Gwilliam Meteorites > > PO Box 26854 > > Tempe AZ 85285 > > http://www.meteoriteimpact.com <http://www.meteoriteimpact.com/> ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
