Hi Matteo and All, The Nikon D1 I used one summer was a real battery pig. However, there have been several upgrades in the models so I believe it is much better now. Moose Peterson has a great website on this stuff.
Here is one of his excellent digital camera websites: http://www.nikondigital.org/ My 5000 and 775 are fairly light on the batteries. But I can burn them up in a day if I use the LCD a lot, or do in-camera viewing and deletions. On another note, I use 265MB cards in them and I believe I get about 20 max-resolution uncompressed images with the 5000 and about 120 images with the 775. They are really different-use cameras. I also have the cable-releases/intervalometer for them, which is a feature I believe is not available for most other digital cameras. It is really a slick little accessory. Nikon does have some other battery options for the cameras, but I only have the single rechargeable batteries and the AC adapter. Cheers, Martin On 3/13/02 7:53 AM, "Matteo Chinellato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all > > Sincerely the digital machines are comfortable why it > can be seen and be unloaded endured the image, but > will not never have a definition as the normal > cameras, sincerely I prefer my Canon EOS 50E or Pentax > MX, or Mamya that one digital, even if ne I have > acquired one for curiosity. The digital consume many > batteries if you cannot connect to them to the > current, and are a lot reduced in the use, always if > you not acquired Nikon D1 or others digital reflex. > Regards > > Matteo > > > --- Jim Strope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I also just purchased a Brand New Nikon Coolpix 5000 >> off of ebay for $871-. I bought it because of it's >> Macro abilities. The Coolpix 950, 990, and 995 also >> have good Macro abilities but are a little less on >> the megapixel scale. Also, they are much cheaper! >> Here is a good website on camera reviews with user >> forums: >> http://www.dpreview.com/ >> >> I am still practicing as I have only had the camera >> a few days. The most difficult thing that I have >> found is getting enough light on the subject as you >> can put the lens as close as .8 inch from the >> subject which tends to allow the camera to throw >> shadows. If anyone knows of a good lighting retail >> source for photography please let me know. Here are >> two photos that I just took. >> >> The first is my .5 gram slice of Calcalong Creek: >> http://208.55.105.193/calcalongcreek.JPG >> >> This photo is a close-up of NWA 482: >> http://208.55.105.193/nwa482closeup.JPG >> >> So far this is a great little Camera/Computer. >> >> Best Wishes...... >> >> Jim Strope >> 421 Fourth Street >> Glen Dale, WV 26038 >> >> Catch a Falling Star Meteorites >> http://www.catchafallingstar.com >> >> > > > ===== > M come Meteorite - Matteo Chinellato > Via Triestina 126/A - 30030 - TESSERA, VENEZIA, ITALY > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sale Site: http://www.mcomemeteorite.com Collection Site: > http://www.mcomemeteorite.info > International Meteorite Collectors Association #2140 > MSN Messanger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > EBAY.COM:http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! > http://mail.yahoo.com/ > > ______________________________________________ > Meteorite-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
