OOOOPS, Sorry, I'm agree with you ! Absolutely not the same!!! It's a confusion in my notes... It's not NWA 832 but probably NWA 868 , NWA 869 and NWA 904 ...
Another meteorite show a visual similar matrix, but it's a different nice H chondrite: NWA 632
Best regards
Vincent
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Charlie Devine)
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (dean bessey)
>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Re: Carbonaceous inclusions in NWAs?
>Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 19:19:15 -0400 (EDT)
>
>Dear Vincent, Dean, and list,
>
>Whatever the other possible pairings with NWA 869, I can't see how NWA
>832 is one of them.
>Here is a photo of a slice of NWA 832 I received as a gift from Rob
>Elliot (thanks again, Rob!): http://fernlea.tripod.com/nwa832146g700.jpg
>Regarding the black clasts in NWA 832, Rob notes that research is
>ongoing but that they are "lithic fragments lacking whole chondrules and
>probably shock blackened fragments of a type 6 chondrite." I have a
>couple of individuals of NWA 869. The crust on these is not nearly as
>fresh as the crust on NWA 832, which is fresh enough to indicate a
>probable recent fall. I also have a slice of NWA 904, and it bears no
>close resemblance to NWA 832, which has been classified as an L4
>regolith breccia.
>
>Best wishes,
>Charlie
>
><< Message3.txt >>
______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
